The World American Dysfunction Made
Military policy is one of those subjects that requires certain bona fides to discuss them with any level of sophistication. It crosses history, sociology, military history and strategy, each of which...
View ArticleThe Supreme Court We Deserve
In one of his questions during oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act, Justice Kennedy observed the judicial presumption in favor of the constitutionality of federal statutes. The presumption is a...
View ArticleAmerica, Religious Freedom, and the Natural Law
A recent George Weigel commencement address. Defending Religious Freedom in Full: A Generation’s Challenge “[A] special word of thanks, today, to the parents of today’s graduates — and the...
View ArticlePresuppositional Constitutionalism
Does the Constitution assume certain presuppositions on the part of those it means to govern? If so, what are those presuppositions? I submit the answer to the first question is yes, and explain the...
View ArticleWhy Did the Court Uphold the Affordable Care Act as a “Tax”
[I won't likely have time to do any deeper analysis of the decision until the distant future, in news-cycle terms. At any rate, the decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, is too...
View ArticleCJ Roberts Might Have Saved the Court, But Was That His Job?
In our discussion in the comments at the main page, Tom Van Dyke and I discussed whether Chief Justice Roberts’ decision in NFIB v. Sebelius, aka, the Obamacare case, demonstrated the essence of...
View ArticleLiberal Democracy Is Not Too Big to Fail
[Originally posted at the main page.] Three months after the infamous Kelo v. New London opinion was issued in June 2005, Professor Thomas W. Merrill testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about...
View ArticleScalia on Reading Law
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia spoke on his new book, Reading Law, at a lunch at the California Club in downtown Los Angeles today, hosted by the Federalist Society. The majority of...
View ArticleThe NSA and Privacy: Why Conservatives Should Not Be Sanguine
Defending the NSA’s program that collects information about the American public’s phone calls and emails, President Obama offered this bit of doublespeak: Well, in the end, and what I’ve said, and I...
View ArticleProp 8 stands!
Consider this: 1. The Supreme Court today ruled in its opinion holding DOMA unconstitutional that the states are entitled to decide their own marriage laws. Assume this is not a meaningless...
View ArticleThe World American Dysfunction Made
Military policy is one of those subjects that requires certain bona fides to discuss them with any level of sophistication. It crosses history, sociology, military history and strategy, each of which...
View ArticleThe Supreme Court We Deserve
In one of his questions during oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act, Justice Kennedy observed the judicial presumption in favor of the constitutionality of federal statutes. The presumption is a...
View ArticleAmerica, Religious Freedom, and the Natural Law
A recent George Weigel commencement address. Defending Religious Freedom in Full: A Generation’s Challenge “[A] special word of thanks, today, to the parents of today’s graduates — and the...
View ArticlePresuppositional Constitutionalism
Does the Constitution assume certain presuppositions on the part of those it means to govern? If so, what are those presuppositions? I submit the answer to the first question is yes, and explain the...
View ArticleWhy Did the Court Uphold the Affordable Care Act as a “Tax”
[I won’t likely have time to do any deeper analysis of the decision until the distant future, in news-cycle terms. At any rate, the decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, is too...
View ArticleCJ Roberts Might Have Saved the Court, But Was That His Job?
In our discussion in the comments at the main page, Tom Van Dyke and I discussed whether Chief Justice Roberts’ decision in NFIB v. Sebelius, aka, the Obamacare case, demonstrated the essence of...
View ArticleLiberal Democracy Is Not Too Big to Fail
[Originally posted at the main page.] Three months after the infamous Kelo v. New London opinion was issued in June 2005, Professor Thomas W. Merrill testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about...
View ArticleScalia on Reading Law
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia spoke on his new book, Reading Law, at a lunch at the California Club in downtown Los Angeles today, hosted by the Federalist Society. The majority of...
View ArticleThe NSA and Privacy: Why Conservatives Should Not Be Sanguine
Defending the NSA’s program that collects information about the American public’s phone calls and emails, President Obama offered this bit of doublespeak: Well, in the end, and what I’ve said, and I...
View ArticleProp 8 stands?
Consider this: 1. The Supreme Court today ruled in its opinion holding DOMA unconstitutional that the states are entitled to decide their own marriage laws. Assume this is not a meaningless statement...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....